Published: April 2025

‍

The Australian federal election on May 3, 2025, will shape the operating environment for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Policies from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Labor government and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s Coalition will influence tax, international trade, cash flow, and regulation—critical areas for SME success. Drawing on policy announcements, ATO rules, and industry insights, this article examines how these policies affect SMEs across diverse industries, highlighting benefits and challenges with specific examples to guide business owners.

‍

Tax Policies: Relief vs. Investment

Labor and Coalition tax policies shape SME tax obligations and financial strategies, with distinct outcomes for small businesses.

• Labor (Albanese): Labor’s $1,000 instant tax deduction for work-related expenses, announced in April 2025, simplifies claims for SME employees, boosting local spending that benefits many companies. “No paperwork, just tick the box,” Albanese said, reducing admin for SMEs. The $200 million annual boost to the ATO’s Tax Avoidance Taskforce, driving $100 billion in 2022–23 corporate tax receipts, ensures multinationals pay fairly, supporting competitive SMEs. However, reducing the Instant Asset Write-Off to $1,000 from July 2025 limits deductions for equipment, increasing tax burdens for various SMEs across multiple industries.
  ‍
• Coalition (Dutton): Dutton’s $30,000 permanent Instant Asset Write-Off for SMEs with turnover under $10 million may encourage investment in tools or software assets, enabling “cash to invest, take risks, and create jobs,” per his campaign. A $1,200 tax offset for earners up to $144,000 increases employee disposable income, benefiting retail SMEs. However, $24 billion in unfunded pledges, including a $20,000 meal deduction, risks inflation, raising SME input costs, per RBA warnings.
  ‍

SME Impact Example:
- A Brisbane architecture firm with $1,000,000 turnover could potentially deduct $30,000 for new design software implementation under Dutton’s policy, with SMEs saving up to $7,500 in tax (25% rate), supporting project capacity.

- Under Labor’s $1,000 cap, deductions are limited to $1,000, saving only $250, potentially constraining some software investments critical for design work.

‍

International Trade: Stability vs. Protectionism

Trade policies influence SME export opportunities and supply chain costs, vital for retail and manufacturing.

• Labor (Albanese): Labor’s stable trade approach leverages Australia’s Asian ties. A $24 million investment in Tasmania’s Boyer paper mill supports export-focused SMEs, creating supply chain opportunities for retail suppliers. Labor’s ban on foreign investors buying existing homes, effective April 1, 2025, stabilises domestic markets, aiding trade-focused SMEs by easing cost-of-living pressures. However, global trade war risks could disrupt SME export markets, per economic forecasts.
  ‍
• Coalition (Dutton): Dutton’s National Gas Plan prioritises domestic supply to lower energy costs, reducing production expenses for manufacturing SMEs. His 25% migration cut and foreign home purchase ban signal protectionism, risking trade tensions. Cutting international student visas by 80,000 could cost $4.3 billion in education exports, impacting SMEs like training providers, per CAANZ estimates.
  ‍

SME Impact Example:
- A Melbourne retail SME exporting products to Asia benefits from Labor’s stable trade, securing $200,000 in ASEAN contracts.
‍
- Dutton’s migration cuts could reduce local staff, increasing labour costs by $25,000 annually.

‍

Cash Flow: Stimulus vs. Savings

Government initiatives, while not direct cash flow policies, affect SME liquidity through spending and cost relief.

• Labor (Albanese): Labor’s $10 billion housing plan, building 100,000 homes, generates contracts for construction SMEs, with suppliers like hardware retailers gaining $50,000–$100,000 in orders. The $150 energy bill rebate, extended to 2025, lowers SME overheads. However, ATO’s resumed debt collection has strained retail, with 4,000 firms facing cash flow issues since 2022, per industry reports.
  ‍
• Coalition (Dutton): Dutton’s halved fuel excise (saving 25.4¢ per litre) reduces transport costs for SMEs like logistics firms, saving $5,000 annually for a 10-vehicle fleet. His $5 billion housing infrastructure pledge boosts construction SME cash flow. However, $100 billion in proposed spending cuts could reduce public contracts by 15%, per Infrastructure Australia, impacting SME revenue.
  ‍

SME Impact Example:
- A Perth construction SME secures $150,000 in contracts from Labor’s housing plan, enhancing cash flow.

- Dutton’s fuel excise cut saves $4,000 yearly, but spending cuts could cost $35,000 in public works revenue.

‍

Regulation: Oversight vs. Deregulation

Regulatory policies impact SME compliance costs and operational flexibility.

• Labor (Albanese): Labor’s $365.5 million boost to ATO and ASIC targets tax fraud and phoenixing, protecting compliant SMEs. Its ban on non-compete clauses for workers earning under $175,000 eases SME hiring, per Treasury. However, 2025’s monthly GST reporting for non-compliant SMEs (ATO rules, April 1) adds 5–10 hours of monthly admin for businesses with late lodgments.
  ‍
• Coalition (Dutton): Dutton’s streamlined environmental approvals for gas projects reduce compliance costs for energy-dependent SMEs, saving $8,000 annually. His $840 million freight bypass project eases logistics red tape. However, his nuclear energy plan lacks regulatory clarity, risking delays for manufacturing SMEs, per energy sector analysis.
  ‍

SME Impact Example:
- A Sydney logistics SME saves $7,000 in compliance under Dutton’s deregulation but faces hiring challenges under Labor’s non-compete ban, increasing recruitment costs by $10,000.

‍
‍

Conclusion

Labor’s policies offer SMEs trade stability and housing-driven cash flow but impose higher tax and regulatory burdens. Dutton’s deregulation and tax relief enhance SME liquidity and investment, yet protectionism and spending cuts risk trade and revenue disruptions. SMEs should independently weigh these impacts to determine the best path for their business.

‍

‍

‍

This article outlines some potential tax implications, and as tax law interpretations vary and are not yet in force, SMEs should use these examples for illustrative purposes only.

‍