Published: May 2025

‍

Serious misconduct, such as theft, fraud, violence, or deliberate safety breaches, represents some of the most challenging issues an Australian business can face, justifying summary dismissal without notice. With 5% of terminations in Australia linked to serious misconduct (Fair Work Commission, 2024), businesses must act decisively while ensuring procedural fairness to avoid unfair dismissal claims. This article provides a comprehensive exploration of serious misconduct, including its definition, legal framework, investigation processes, and best practices for managing these high-stakes situations.

‍

Defining Serious Misconduct

Serious misconduct is defined under the Fair Work Act as willful or deliberate behaviour that is inconsistent with the continuation of employment, causing serious risk to the health, safety, or reputation of the business or its employees. Examples include:

• Theft or fraud, such as an employee falsifying expense claims or stealing company property.
• Workplace violence or harassment, including physical assault or bullying.
• Deliberate safety breaches, such as ignoring machinery safety protocols in a factory.
• Serious breaches of company policy, like disclosing confidential client information.
• Intoxication at work, posing risks to colleagues or customers.

Unlike general misconduct (e.g., tardiness), serious misconduct warrants immediate dismissal, provided the employer follows a fair process. Employees terminated for serious misconduct are entitled to accrued leave but not notice or payment in lieu.

‍

Legal Framework

The Fair Work Act allows summary dismissal for serious misconduct but requires employers to follow procedural fairness to avoid unfair dismissal claims. Key legal requirements include:

• Investigation: Conduct a thorough investigation to gather evidence, such as CCTV footage, witness statements, or financial records. For example, an employee accused of theft should be investigated using stock records and security footage.
• Opportunity to Respond: Employees must be given a chance to respond to allegations, typically in a formal meeting with a support person present. This ensures procedural fairness, a key factor in defending unfair dismissal claims.
• Documentation: Maintain detailed records of the investigation, allegations, employee responses, and termination rationale to support the decision in case of disputes.
• Final Pay: Pay accrued leave, such as annual leave, but not notice, as per the Fair Work Act.

Failure to follow these steps can lead to unfair dismissal claims, with 65% of serious misconduct cases resulting in settlements or reinstatement due to procedural errors (Fair Work Commission, 2024).

‍

Investigation and Termination Process

Handling serious misconduct requires a structured approach to ensure fairness and compliance:

• Initiate an Investigation: Upon discovering potential misconduct, gather evidence promptly. For example, a retail store suspecting an employee of stealing cash might review till records and CCTV footage.
• Suspend the Employee (if Necessary): If the misconduct poses an immediate risk, suspend the employee on full pay pending the investigation. This protects the workplace while ensuring fairness.
• Notify the Employee: Inform the employee of the allegations in writing, outlining the evidence and inviting them to a meeting to respond.
• Conduct a Fair Hearing: Hold a meeting where the employee can present their side, with a support person if requested. For instance, an employee accused of harassment should be allowed to explain their actions.
• Make a Decision: Based on the evidence and employee response, determine if serious misconduct is substantiated. If so, issue a written termination notice, specifying the reason and final pay details.
• Document Everything: Record all steps, including evidence, meeting notes, and the termination letter, to defend against potential claims.

‍

Best Practices for Managing Serious Misconduct

To handle serious misconduct effectively, businesses should adopt the following best practices:

• Develop Clear Policies: Establish a code of conduct outlining unacceptable behaviours, such as theft or harassment, and communicate it during onboarding.
• Train Managers: Provide training on conducting investigations, ensuring procedural fairness, and documenting processes to reduce legal risks.
• Act Promptly: Address misconduct immediately to prevent escalation and demonstrate a commitment to workplace safety and integrity.
• Seek Legal Advice: Consult HR or legal professionals for complex cases, such as allegations involving protected attributes or high-profile employees.
• Maintain Confidentiality: Protect the privacy of all parties involved to avoid reputational damage and ensure a fair process.

‍

Real-World Example

A Perth-based logistics company discovers an employee falsifying delivery records to claim overtime. The manager initiates an investigation, reviewing GPS logs and delivery receipts, and suspends the employee on full pay. The employee is invited to a meeting, where they admit to the falsification under financial pressure. The company terminates the employee for serious misconduct, paying accrued leave but not notice. Detailed documentation and a fair process ensure the termination withstands a Fair Work review, protecting the company from legal repercussions.

‍

Conclusion

Serious misconduct requires swift, decisive action balanced with procedural fairness to protect businesses from legal and reputational risks. By conducting thorough investigations, following Fair Work guidelines, and maintaining clear policies, businesses can manage these high-stakes situations effectively. Training and legal consultation are critical to ensuring compliance and maintaining a safe, ethical workplace.

‍

Disclaimer: Serious misconduct cases carry significant legal risks. Consult legal professionals for guidance on specific cases.